Wake Forest Law Review

Wake Forest Law Review

  • Home
  • About
    • Staff
      • Current Staff
      • Masthead Archive
    • Submissions
    • Subscriptions
    • Joining Law Review
  • WFLR Print
  • WFLR Online
  • Blog
  • Symposia
46 Wake Forest L. Rev. 937

Iqbal’s Retro Revolution

Benjamin P. Cooper

This Article proceeds chronologically. Part I describes pleading from 1938 until 1983 under the notice pleading regime put in place by the drafters of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Part II surveys the harsh features of the 1983 amendments to Rule 11 and the effect it had on pleading. Part III details the 1993 amendments to Rule 11 that restored notice pleading. Part IV discusses the Twombly and Iqbal decisions and the important ways in which they changed pleading. Part V then explores the significant similarities between the 1983–1993 era of pleading and the post-Iqbal era, including the implications of this historical link.

Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Email this to someone
email
Print this page
Print
Read Full Article

Topics: Issue 5
←Previous: Demystifying the Determination of Foreign Law in U.S. Courts: Opening the Door to a Greater Global Understanding
Wake Forest Law Review
Next: Winning the Game of Appellate Musical Shoes: When the Appeals Band Plays, Jump from the Client’s to the Judge’s Shoes to Write the Statement of Facts Ballad→
Wake Forest Law Review

Wake Forest Law Review